
Broken sticks and broken stones
Will turn to dust just like our bones
It’s words that hurt the most now isn’t it
Are you sad inside, are you home alone
If I could just pick up the phone
Maybe you could see a better day
And you won’t waste away under my watchful eye
Because I’m your hero and you’re my weakness
Who’s gonna break my fall
When the spinning starts
The colors bleed together and fade
Was it ever there at all
Or have I lost my way
The path of least resistance Is catching up with me again today
I’m broken down, not good enough
The broken promises add up
To twice their weight in tears which I have caused
I’m afraid to sink, I’m afraid to swim
I’m sad to say I miss my friends
I know that I’m supposed to step away
But they need me to stay and keep a watchful eye
On all my heroes and all their demons
But who’s gonna break my fall When the spinning starts
The colors bleed together and fade Was it ever there at all
Or have I lost my way
The path of least resistance
Is catching up with me again today
Not today
Not today
The picture of the bouganvilla is one that I nourished a couple of years ago. These colorful outdoor plants are my favorite. While initially their beauty draws us to them, it is their other qualities that reveal their beauty to be part of a meaningful and metaphorical existence.
A favored plant in Texas, they are heat tolerant and drought resistant. In fact, the hotter it is the better they love it. And as long as it is warm and they are watered and fed, they will grow and bloom prolifically all year. Their colors are expressed in vibrant shades of pink, purple and white and their blooms are protected with a thorn that will have any gardener taking precaution before getting too familiar with the vines. Supported by arbors or stakes, they will forge to great heights bringing images of strong color and courageous texture able to hold their own among any garden or elaborate landscaping. And today they offer a focus for forgiveness; when it’s not today.
In the previous blog, I addressed forgiveness and the freedom it offers us to begin again. For many of us, finding and receiving forgiveness for ourselves, our own regrets or even for others who, may have been a part in changing the course of our lives without so much as asking our permission, gives us the freedom to live our lives without harboring resentment. But for others of us, a question may linger regarding individuals in our experience, who played particular roles in changing the course of our lives, yet have never sought forgiveness or repair. How do we make peace with that?
In addressing this question, my perspective will offer an admitted bias biopsychologoically, socially, spiritually and personally. While it is my hope that it is a helpful and healing response, it is one that readers may feel free to take what works for them and leave what doesn’t.
From a biopsychological perspective, it might be helpful to understand how our emotional conflicts and hurts are rooted and wired. From a psychodynamic and Imago perspective, we know that 90% of our issues are rooted in history, only 10% has anything to do with what is currently taking place.
Simplistically, we can speak of our emotional processing in our brains as consisting in three parts; a conscious, an unconscious and the biological aspect of the autonomic nervous system regulating the emotional queuing, interpretation and response.
The conscious part of the brain is the cerebral cortex and this is considered the decision maker of the brain. It has the ability to be intentional, rational, choiceful, self-aware, reflective and self-observant. It is that part of our brain that interacts with language and symbols, science, literature and art.
The unconscious of the brain where our emotions are interpreted. It includes what is called the HPA Axis; Hypothalmic-Pituitary-Adrenal. Here is where the memory and content of our lives is circulating, in the form of “prototypes” which act as interpreters for subsequent experiences. The Hippocampus is the what is considered the key structure for both emotional and verbal memory. The amygdala is the structure creating memory, emotional content of memory and the feeling responses to those memories. The limbic system plays a primary role for information and regulation of memory and associated emotions.
The biological part of the brain involved with our emotions is the autonomic system including both the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system. The sympathetic nervous system can be described as the accelerator, fight-or-flight, and the parasympathetic can be described as the brake, regulating salivation, tears, urination, digestion and defecation.
From a psycho-social perspective, the first time we enter the world in utero, we begin emotional attachments. Once we arrive outside the uterus we begin physically interacting with the world. Beginning with our parents first, we begin forming organizational principles by which we learn to attach meaning to people, symbols, behaviors and events contributing to the course of life. These interactions along with the organizational structures become the memory “lesson plans” and a trajectory for our relational dynamics and their meaning, both personally and interpersonally.
It is through the messages a child receives via parental/social interaction, sight, hearing and feeling, that he or she learns a language for feelings of acceptance, rejection, comfort, aloneness, joy, being wanted or unwanted. In acquiring the language of feelings, the child learns by participation, observation, instruction or intuition, how to respond or react to the messages surrounding behaviors and feelings . The stimulus received by the child will be followed by a biological response from the body with either a fight or flight or a regulating response taking place. This biological sequencing contributes heavily to the personal and interpersonal shaping of individual functioning in familial and social contexts.
At a young age, a child has received enough messages in the form of stimuli influencing his or her behavior to have established dynamics and patterns that will be considered part of the identity and personality. Socially, this translates to mean that if the stimulus-response messages received by a child interpret behaviors to mean he is loved, and is safe to trust feeling loved and accepted by mom and dad, a memory prototype will be created, consequently acting as a script informing the child to respond with the same feelings of comfort and acceptance in a larger context of social settings.
Conversely, the opposite is also likely. This translates to mean that if a child experiences behaviors that he/she learns to mean rejection in the form of criticism, blame or shame, then he or she will also create a memory prototype which will inform the child that specific behaviors equal rejection and to respond to criticism, blame and shame as statements of rejection.
It is the accumulation of these memories in the form of historical data that is what we understand to be responsible for that 90% of our adult issues.
This means from a sociological perspective that when we become adults, the dynamics and patterns that became the memory prototypes are the ones we have responded to, consciously or unconsciously, throughout our life. For many individuals, these responses have been strengthened over time by psychologically defending them, with the result being the consequential personal and interpersonal dynamics and patterns. For others, conscious recognition that the childhood responses no longer work as an adult, may have instituted adaptive responses for relating more effectively in given circumstances. Still others, recognizing that life seemed to be terribly out of sync somehow may seek professional help and begin to take steps to learn how we are made and where our wounds and hurts occur in our history, so for the purpose of healing, can learn to relate differently, personally and interpersonally.
Spiritually, it is also recognized that these attachment dynamics and patterns from childhood shape not only personal relationships, but spiritual ones as well. Our family influence, because of the adult/child power imbalance, teaches us how to respond to figures with perceived power, including authority, gender and divinities. Many individuals as adults, realize that responses to bosses are similar to how they responded to parents. Attitudes and behaviors within families also contribute significantly to shaping the God image and responses to that image, of person, character, and relationship.
In summary up to this point, regarding forgiveness: when it’s not today, we can extrapolate that each person in a relationship comes to the table with similar contributing facets of life, and relationship issues are largely the results of the interacting historical negative unconscious messages or “wounds” of the individuals.
Within relationships, this resulting interaction or conflict from negative wounds is referred to as being triggered. An example is when husband voices a criticism to his wife and it “triggers” a negative feeling similar to that of one felt in a childhood situation and she responds in the same manner as she did as child. To go a bit further, we could predict that if an individual felt unwanted and screamed as a child, it is safe to predict that yelling would be a familiar “skill” as an adult. If running away when feeling unwanted was a childhood response, we might safely predict as well a similar response as an adult, perhaps in the form feel leaving, even if temporarily, as an adult.
If couples can get professional help and begin to understand their own history and how to find new ways of managing the hurt and healing the wound, it is possible for conflict to be dealt with less intensity. It doesn’t mean we “stuff” our emotions. It means that we learn to recognize them and address them so they do less damage. Hopefully, it also means we learn greater understanding in general, and have fewer conflicts, more effective communication.
Personally, my own journey as an adult has included gaining understanding of the above perspectives. As an adult I realized that history sent many good messages, and many wounding ones as well. The good messages became what I have relied on as skills in life. The wounding ones eventually became recognized as places that needed healing and I am grateful for the gentle and caring individuals, who are of help to me in this area.
For the remainder of this article I want to offer three perspective: a historical perspective so to understand that resolving conflict and trying to achieve a sense of rightness/justice and/ or peace is not new and two spiritual perspectives about what forgiveness means as a value system in the function of resolving conflict.
If we look back historically at the 9th century AD, we would learn that the Norse gods had a respected world view for resolving conflict. Although not progressive in nature, the system recognized the value of the human glory as a foundational virtue. Apart from a universal God, this virtue is referred to as unaided human achievement. Mans’ virtue rests only in strength for being able to fight the gods, and keep them at bay, holding off destruction for one more day. One may defend self or the family honor, but there is no future or redemption. In the end everybody dies, and the gods win – and that’s all folks. There was no other way.
Another way that did come along and one which I have written about previously, offers forgiveness in contrast to human achievement. Understood of as a conditional social act, the first models, presented below, are from Popular Opinions, (1946) by Dorothy Sayers, theologian and essayest. Validating a relative compassion for others, repentance and conditional reconciliation, they serve, in my opinion, generally as an example contrary to forgiveness as a virtue.
- There is the Christian forgiveness which says: “I will forgive you as a Christian, but I will never speak to you again.”
- There is the Priggish forgiveness which says: “I will forgive you, and I will pray for you.”
- There is the Conditional Forgiveness: “I will forgive you on the condition that you will never do that again.”
Finally, yet another perspective of forgiveness also came along. Also explained by Dorothy Sayers, this offer of another way, is one of mystery and sacrifice. Not about demanding repentance, restitution or promising to never offend again, neither is it blind to repair or the need for measures to prevent future damage. Neither a conditional social act, but a framework for re-establishing relationship, the fourth forgiveness offers choice,
- “Is there anything in our minds that will prevent a re-establishment of right relationship?”
- If the answer is yes, the opportunity of relationship is forfeited at that time.
- If the is answer no, forgiveness and the gift of relationship is accepted.
This view, one that is rooted in the willingness to sacrifice for the sake of another, is the gift modeled by Jesus Christ, bearer the penalty of sacrifice for sin, relieving mankind from the responsibility and the consequence of sin – that of an eternity separated from God. As a result of this One’s death on the cross, obligation from penalty was voluntarily discharged. This is compassion at the most vulnerable level.
In this view, what becomes central is me. Yep. It’s all about me. I am the only one who can change circumstances by addressing me. I can only control me. I can show up. I can tell the truth without judgment or blame. I can pay attention to what has meaning. I can release the outcome.
As well as me, what else becomes central is my attitudes, thoughts and feelings. Am I critical? Do I express contempt? Am I defensive? Am I stonewalling?
Generally speaking; me, my wounds, my spirit, my heart and my soul are in my jurisdiction. And I have a choice. I can be Norse – like and defend my honor! Yeah, but everybody still dies in the end and there is no future or redemption. I can also receive another way, the mystery of sacrifice, and with grace accept that God was so head over heels in love with me that came to pursue me when I could have cared less. And without any visible sign of hopeful return of my love, He lovingly provided for my future and redemption.
Finding a sense of justice for the pain or rejection I have received from others who seem to remain oblivious to the knowledge that my wounds could be healed and I could move on with my life if they would only ask for forgiveness, might be found in the Norse choice. I could say, “Yeah. It’s every man for himself. No future. No redemption. Just save me and my feelings”. And in choosing this, it would be, in my mind, where the path of least resistance catches up to me.
The other option is sacrifice, “compassion to everyone, even where it’s not wanted, because we never know what wars are going on down there where the spirit meets the bone.” This is the soul confronting choice, because means that I am no longer asking those who hurt me to be accountable for my pain. The focus is on forgiveness, given to me and wanting it for others.
Then, on the days when my spirit wilts and I wonder about all of the what if’s and whose gonna break my fall when the spinning starts and the colors bleed together and fade, was it ever there at all, have I lost my way or my mind – and I feel the path of least resistance is catching up with me again – then, on those days – this option of sacrifice and forgiveness received is what gives me permission to respond with the hope of future and redemption and I can say …Not today…Not today…and in a way not at all unlike that bouganvilla.
I hope this additional perspective is helpful.
For the Support of Your Life
For the Many Sides of Life
Paulette Jackson
facets@bellsouth.net
The opinions expressed in The Conversant Counselor’s Blog are those belonging to Paulette Jackson and do not necessarily belong to any other professional or individual.
Lyrics: Path of Least Resistance/Brandi Carlile